Log in

Top Stories        News         Sports

Opinion

Death by misadventure

Write a comment

User Rating: 5 / 5

Star ActiveStar ActiveStar ActiveStar ActiveStar Active

Chris MetitationsBy Chris Edwards

In 1969, Brian Jones, the Rolling Stones’ shaggy-haired, mercurial guitarist was found dead in a swimming pool. The ruling: “death by misadventure.”

Oh, how those Brits have a way with euphemisms. In the United Kingdom, that phrase is used to describe an accidental death caused by a risk taken of one’s own volition. Theories abound as to what actually happened to Jones, but an autopsy revealed his death occurred while he was under the influence of alcohol and drugs.

Americans know sadly, and all-too-well, the dangers of death by misadventure, even if that phrase does not appear on coroners’ post-mortem findings here, and although our fair share of glamorous rock stars have met untimely ends due to substance(s), the problem knows all ages, income tax brackets and other demographic signifiers.

Every generation, it would seem, has a problem linked to a certain drug, and this generation, it would seem, has the deadliest one of them, yet, yoked around its neck: fentanyl.

It is an issue that mars all corners of our country, but Texas has an especially pressing problem with the substance. U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention data shows that fentanyl-related overdoses in our state rose by 399% between 2019 and 2021.

Fentanyl is a synthetic opioid and is often mixed with drugs such as heroin. One source stated that the drug was the cause of more than 5,000 fatal Texan overdoses in from 2021 to 2022. Experts claim that the drug is 50 times more potent than heroin, and sadly, many of those 5,000+ deaths appear that the users were unaware they were ingesting fentanyl.

In a perfect world, people would not feel the need to obtain a good feeling via synthetic means that might harm, but as we know, that utopia does not exist, and people want to feel high, often at the expense of their health.

There’s no crime in wanting to feel a “high,” whatever that might entail. People are going to pursue an elevated state, whether that comes from driving too fast; eating insanely spicy foods; bungee jumping or however one gets one’s kicks. Sadly, some do so by turning to illicit substances.

As many times as a parental figure, or someone with caution in mind, might implore one to proceed with extreme caution, we all know that people are going to do what they’re gonna do; lessons learned the hard way. The “Just Say No” rhetoric of Nancy Reagan’s era does not work for everyone.

The problem with fentanyl is that lesson is often fatal. As more of the drug pours into our state, more unnecessary deaths will occur. The drug is odorless and tasteless, which makes detection almost impossible without specialized equipment, such as testing strips.

In today’s hyper-partisan climate of the country’s two biggest street gangs bickering back and forth, anything labelled “bipartisan” seems about as rare as finding eyebrows on eggs. One thing that both the red and blue tribes can agree on is that fentanyl is an enormous problem.

This year, our lawmakers failed constituents on a measure that could prevent overdoses and save lives. A bill that would have legalized fentanyl testing strips passed the lower chamber, yet died in the Senate, despite support from Gov. Greg Abbott. The testing strips are classified as drug paraphernalia, at present.

The War on Drugs has been an enormous failure, with untold billions of dollars poured into punitive measures regarding dangerous drugs. Instead of this measure, basing drug policy on a moral model, emphasis needs to be placed on harm reduction, which such practices as legalizing fentanyl testing strips works toward.

There is nothing inherently “moral” or “immoral” about using drugs, and those who choose to use them deserve fundamental human rights, including, above all, the right to live.

Policymaking based on fear and mythologies needs to be replaced with evidence-based approaches in the name of harm reduction, education and keeping people healthy and safe.

Along with measures such as legalized testing strips, the state should enact a “Good Samaritan” policy, where someone can call 911, if they suspect someone is experiencing an overdose, without any fear of arrest or subsequent prosecution. Access to Narcan, a drug which can reverse an opioid overdose, should also be increased.

People will get their kicks however they choose to do so, but there are ways the risks can be mitigated. Prevention cannot exist if there is no attention given to harm reduction.

  • Hits: 1340

If you don’t participate, then don’t complain

1 Comment
Star InactiveStar InactiveStar InactiveStar InactiveStar Inactive

From The Editors Desk Emily WootenWhat do you think are the most pressing issues facing Polk County? What do you think the priorities for Polk County should be? Do you value quality of life over economic growth or vice versa? Or are they equally important in your mind?

There are myriad issues of importance – health care, education, infrastructure, affordable housing, public transportation, recreation, shopping, dining. But what should be the primary focus? Now is your chance to contribute and share your thoughts. You and I have the opportunity to identify priorities, foster collaboration, create inclusive solutions, drive economic growth and enhance quality of life. And it couldn’t be simpler. All you have to do is take a quick survey at https://www.co.polk.tx.us/page/polk.county.news

The strategic planning process presently underway is a collaborative effort aimed at developing a comprehensive county-wide strategic plan. This plan will serve as a roadmap to guide the collective vision and goals for Polk County. It will outline the aspirations, priorities and strategies to enhance various aspects of the community, including economic growth, public services, infrastructure development and more.

This is a tremendous opportunity. Each one of us is being given a platform to share our views on what local priorities should be, to plan for the future and to help create policy.

There are three different surveys. One is geared toward residents, one is geared toward business owners and one is specifically for elected officials and government staff members. Business owners and entrepreneurs can provide insights that will shape strategies for economic growth, job creation and a thriving business environment. Residents’ perspectives on public services, recreation, transportation and environmental concerns will guide efforts to enhance the overall quality of life in Polk County. Elected officials and government staff members play a pivotal role in implementing policies and initiatives. Their input will facilitate collaboration and innovative solutions for a progressive county.

Participation in the strategic planning process is easy and impactful. You may complete one or all three of the surveys tailored to your role and perspective. Diverse viewpoints will enable the development of solutions that cater to a wide range of needs, fostering inclusivity and unity within the county. Input will help to identify the most pressing issues and prioritize them effectively to address the core concerns of the community.

The surveys are simple to follow and take very little time, yet they can impact all our futures. Your contribution matters. Engage in the process and encourage your friends, family and coworkers to participate as well. Together, we can create a strategic plan that truly represents the aspirations of our entire community. Let’s work together to build a brighter future for Polk County.

  • Hits: 1588

Politics and the art of misdirection

Write a comment
Star InactiveStar InactiveStar InactiveStar InactiveStar Inactive

FromEditorsDesk Tony CroppedBy Tony Farkas
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

I’ve always been fond of the word obfuscation, largely because I watch it unfold almost on a daily basis.

Illusionists use a version of this to perform their feats, and it seems it’s an ability taken quite to heart by our leaders.

Events, drama and issues bounce around the press, social media and watercooler conversations about trivialities which probably covers for serious issues that we the public don’t need to be aware of.

So, for instance, while you saw post after post after news story about the dress code being changed in the Senate for perpetual teenager John Fetterman, the House is debating on sending more and more of our tax dollars to the Ukraine by piggybacking on measures to provide relief to U.S. citizens suffering after natural disasters.

Even that event is misleading, to my mind, since there hasn’t been a proper federal budget passed since 2006. Now there is talk of a shutdown — again — so be prepared for more drama about people going without paychecks and seniors not getting Social Security checks, all of which will distract from the fact that pretty much the No. 1 job our legislators are supposed to do, which is fund the government.

Another for instance in my mind is the way-over-the-top “debate” over gender, which dominates pretty much every news and information source. The more things the government does that bear scrutiny, the more over-the-top things become.

While to many it may seem legitimate and serious, I have to wonder what is going unnoticed, say, like the fact that the legitimately issued leases for exploration and drilling in Alaska were unilaterally cancelled, the Strategic Petroleum Reserve is mostly depleted and new drilling leases will not be issued.

Similarly, the UAW is striking because of the government’s insistence on switching to electric vehicles, leaving the country dependent on other countries for oil that run cars and lithium that go into the batteries that run EVs.

There’s so much more that is going on behind the scenes, but we hear about the mannequin Vice President now in charge of a new commission on gun control, apparently since she did such a standup job being in charge of an effort regarding immigration and border issues. We’re not hearing about why, even though we’re told otherwise, that the economy is in the toilet, that resources and items are becoming harder to find, that electrical grids are becoming notoriously unreliable.

That last one is especially puzzling. I’ve lived through power outages before, most if not all of which were caused by serious weather events. I feel, however, that there have been more power outages in my neck of the woods just this summer than there have been in the last 40 years.

One of the keys to control in a governmental sense is control of information. A recent article I’ve read said that for the last few decades, the information given to college students has been framed in such a way that students have become disillusioned with the country; and the government is spoon-feeding its constituency drivel to keep attention focused elsewhere while it manufactures crises to keep things destabilized.

At a recent talk, a local congressman said that in order to be informed, you should gather information from any and all sources you can find, and the truth will be somewhere in the middle. I would amend that sentiment by saying you’ll have to make up your own mind, and decide whether your source can be trusted.

Tony Farkas is publisher of the San Jacinto News-Times and the Trinity County News-Standard. He can be reached at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. The views expressed here are his own and do not necessarily reflect the views of this publication.

  • Hits: 1090

Seize the moment: At 50-year mark, celebrate and strengthen the Public Information Act

Write a comment
Star InactiveStar InactiveStar InactiveStar InactiveStar Inactive

Kelley Column MugBy Kelley Shannon
Executive Director, Freedom of Information
Foundation of Texas

With trust in government waning, a Texas law can help keep a closer watch on public officials. Even citizens who continue to have faith in government can use this law to stay better informed.

How is taxpayer money spent? What’s happening behind the scenes as government decisions are made?

The Texas Public Information Act produces answers to these crucial questions. The act has been here for us for 50 years and is essential in protecting our right to know.

Like a well-built old house, the landmark law is constantly in need of upkeep, yet it withstands the test of time. It can expose the truth.

At the half-century mark, let’s seize the moment to strengthen the Public Information Act to ensure it works for future generations. The nonprofit Freedom of Information Foundation of Texas will explore this idea at its state conference Sept. 28 in Austin. Discussions will feature transparency advocates, state lawmakers, journalists and everyday Texans from East Texas to Uvalde who have fought for more openness, sometimes in matters of life and death.

The Public Information Act was at issue in a court victory in June to force the release of Texas Department of Public Safety records related to a 2022 mass shooting at Robb Elementary School in Uvalde. The law was also the subject of legislation enacted Sept. 1 to close a loophole some police departments used to hide information when someone dies in law enforcement custody.

Other new legislation to keep the law up to date defines “business day” in the act to prevent government offices from wrongly shutting their doors to information requestors, as many did for months during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Originally known as the Open Records Act when it was enacted in 1973, the Public Information Act is steeped in our state’s history. It came about in a tumultuous time after the Sharpstown scandal in state government. Attorney Bill Aleshire, then a legislative aide for a sponsor of the Open Records Act, recalls helping to write the bill using model legislation from the nonprofit group Common Cause and the best open records ideas from other states.

The Texas law became one of the strongest in the nation. It presumes state and local government records are open – giving citizens a great deal of power in asking for documents, emails, videos and other items – unless a specific exception prevents releasing the information. In most cases, government agencies must ask permission from the Texas Attorney General’s Office to withhold records. The office is supposed to be an unbiased arbiter, with staffers acting as umpires, of sorts, in thousands of rulings every year.

The importance of the agency’s Open Government Division was highlighted in the recent Texas Senate impeachment trial of Attorney General Ken Paxton, who was accused of abusing his

power over the public information law. He was acquitted of that charge and all other impeachment counts.

Along with impartial decisions from the attorney general’s office, the Public Information Act needs updated, effective enforcement measures to hold individual government agencies accountable if they are not following the law.

Ideas on how to boost enforcement are plentiful, ranging from imposing financial penalties on misbehaving governments to increasing public officials’ training requirements to ensuring information requestors can recover attorneys’ fees if they must sue to obtain public records.

With the right tools, we can safeguard the intent of the law, which states in its preamble that the people insist on remaining informed.

“The people,” it says, “in delegating authority, do not give their public servants the right to decide what is good for the people to know and what is not good for them to know.”

Kelley Shannon is executive director of the Freedom of Information Foundation of Texas, an Austin-based 501(c)(3) nonprofit dedicated to protecting the public’s right to know and speak out about government.

  • Hits: 1644

Impeach! a new battle cry

Write a comment
Star InactiveStar InactiveStar InactiveStar InactiveStar Inactive

FromEditorsDesk Tony CroppedBy Tony Farkas

Ken Paxton, Texas’ attorney general, has been acquitted of all charges brought against him in an effort to impeach the elected official.

This has been an ongoing spectacle since before the end of May, when the charges were recommended at the end of this year’s legislative session.

Regardless of whether Ken Paxton committed any offenses, the impeachment process served as the latest spectacle in the bread-and-circuses government that the state and country now enjoys.

I say that because this is the first impeachment of a Texas elected official in more than 100 years and was rushed through and handled so badly that Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick wants to change the impeachment process.

I’m not convinced that the problem lies in the process; my feeling is that the problem is the degradation of politics in general. No longer is there anything remotely like discussion, debate, or common sense. Once a side picks a position, then any and everything will be done to force opponents to comply, up to and including impeachment. The courts and political processes have now become clubs.

That sentiment was the driving force behind the impeachment efforts against former President Trump. It didn’t matter whether the charges were backed by credible evidence (they weren’t). It only mattered that the president wasn’t “on the side of the angels” and needed to be brought down.

After the first one failed to cow the president, the House doubled down on a second article of impeachment. Nancy Pelosi even alluded to the fact that they knew it wouldn’t fly but did it anyway so Trump would be the only president in the history of history to have been impeached twice.

Since then, the cry to impeach has been bandied around about every person in every level of government that doesn’t fall into line.

Don’t like how Dr. Anthony Fauci handled the COVID crisis? Impeach.

Don’t like how Merrick Garland is handling the DOJ? Impeach.

Don’t like the newly elected Supreme Court Justice? Impeach.

School superintendent making fun of librarian leads to bomb threats? Impeach.

Don’t like the brand of cookies you bought from the Girl Scouts? Impeach.

You get the idea. However, by calling for impeachment continuously over anything belittles the call when there actually is malfeasance, or high crimes and misdemeanors, which leaves the voting public numb and uninterested (which I’m sure is by design).

Even the latest inquiries into President Biden are being met with shoulder shrugs and apathy.

The impeachment process itself is pretty much the only means the people have to remove bad actors from office, and that really is by design. Most, if not all, states, have laws protecting elected officials from facing criminal or civil prosecution when performing official duties, regardless of the outcome of bad decisions. Also, not every state has recall elections, and those that do have ridiculous requirements that the effort is abandoned.

For instance, former President Nixon, facing impeachment only in connection with the Watergate scandal, resigned office and that was it. The actual actors, such as G. Gordon Liddy, were not elected and consequently were convicted of crimes.

Shield laws need to be rethought, and investigations need to be done without any interference, in order for proper consequences to be meted out. Only then will impeachments and electoral malfeasance be treated with the seriousness they deserve.

Tony Farkas is editor of the Trinity County News-Standard and the San Jacinto News-Times. He can be reached at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..

  • Hits: 1293